The Supreme Court: A Neutral Arbiter or a Political Weapon?

The Supreme Court’s role as a neutral interpreter of the law is under scrutiny. Critics argue the court has become overly politicized, while proponents maintain it’s simply upholding the Constitution. Recent rulings on abortion, presidential immunity, and administrative agencies have fueled this debate. Some advocate for term limits, an ethics code, and even a restructuring of the court. The debate revolves around whether the court should strictly follow the law as written or take a more active role in shaping policy.